Radeon X1650 GT vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
-
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
256
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
22 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
3.0
Shader Model
6.5
