Radeon X1650 GT vs MTT S10
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 2GB VRAM MTT S10 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
MTT S10 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Oct 2023
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
SM Count
-
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
Unknown
230 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
3.0
Shader Model
6.5
