RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs GeForce MX150
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1695MHz vs 1532MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores
GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1227%
15620
GeForce MX150
1177
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+787%
8910
GeForce MX150
1004
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1681%
3580
GeForce MX150
201
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2017
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1469 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
36
SM Count
3
4608
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
25W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
GP108
-
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1
(N17S-G1-A1)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
