Home Comparison RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVS 5200M

RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVS 5200M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4512 additional rendering cores
NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 115W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation +6408%
15620
NVS 5200M
240

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

36
SM Count
2
4608
Shading Units
96
144
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
4
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

115W
TDP
25W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD106
GPU Name
GF117
-
GPU Variant
N13M-NS1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net