Home Comparison RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB

RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1695MHz vs 1612MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 115W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation +89%
15620
RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB
8253
Blender
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation +111%
2764
RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB
1308

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

36
SM Count
20
4608
Shading Units
2560
144
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
48
144
Tensor Cores
80
36
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

115W
TDP
95W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD106
GPU Name
GA107
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net