Tesla C2075 vs GRID M10 8Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 8GB VRAM GRID M10 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
GRID M10 8Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
GRID M10 8Q
+62%
1672
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2016
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
640
56
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GM107
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
GM107-570-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
