Tesla C2075 vs Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+187%
2957
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2020
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
14
448
Shading Units
896
56
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
TU117B
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
