Tesla C2075 vs Radeon Instinct MI100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 300W)
Radeon Instinct MI100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1502MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Radeon Instinct MI100
+2144%
23070
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2020
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1502 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
120
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
7680
56
TMUs
480
48
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.13 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
721.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
184.6 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.07 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.54 TFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
Arcturus
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
Arcturus XL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3 billion
Transistors
25.6 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
750 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
