Tesla C2075 vs Radeon Instinct MI8
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI8 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Radeon Instinct MI8 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Radeon Instinct MI8
+696%
8192
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2016
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
783 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
175W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
Fiji
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
