UHD Graphics 32EU vs Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 32EU and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
UHD Graphics 32EU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 176% (2350MHz vs 850MHz)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics 32EU
435
Arc 140T Mobile
+1006%
4813
3DMark Time Spy
UHD Graphics 32EU
815
Arc 140T Mobile
+392%
4012
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
UHD Graphics 32EU
382
Arc 140T Mobile
+419%
1986
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
350 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
256
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
6.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
870.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
108.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Jasper Lake GT1
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
Generation 11.0
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm+
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
