Xeon 6325P vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654
We compared two server CPUs: Xeon 6325P with 4 cores 3.5GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Xeon 6325P 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (55W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4800)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)
Score
General Parameters
Feb 2025
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Raptor Lake-R
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 1700
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon 6 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Package
-
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
55 W
Power Consumption
360 W
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
163 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
4
Total Core Count
96
8
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
35.0
Multiplier
24.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1.25 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
12 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
12
76.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
5
16
PCIe Lanes
128
