Home Comparison Xeon L5335 vs Centaur CHA

Xeon L5335 vs Centaur CHA

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon L5335 with 4 cores 2GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon L5335 's Advantages
Released 106 years and 7 months late
Higher base frequency (2GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 3)
More modern manufacturing process (16nm vs 65nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 5 Single Core
Xeon L5335
308
Centaur CHA +64%
508
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Xeon L5335
102
Centaur CHA +3212%
3379
VS

General Parameters

Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 1901
Intel
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Clovertown
Core Architecture
CHA
Intel Socket 771
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Clovertown)
Generation
CHA (CNS)

Package

0.582 billions
Transistor Count
-
65 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
50 W
Power Consumption
70 W
60 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
-
Foundry
TSMC
2x143 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²

CPU Performance

2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
4
Total Core Count
8
4
Total Thread Count
8
333 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
6.0
Multiplier
12.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
4 MB per die
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
-
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR2, DDR3
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
2
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

0
PCIe Version
3
-
PCIe Lanes
44

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy