Home Comparison Xeon Platinum 8260 vs EPYC Embedded 8434P

Xeon Platinum 8260 vs EPYC Embedded 8434P

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon Platinum 8260 with 24 cores 2.4GHz and EPYC Embedded 8434P with 48 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon Platinum 8260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (165W vs 200W)
EPYC Embedded 8434P 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 35.75MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Dec 2018
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Cascade Lake-SP
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel Socket 3647
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Platinum(Cascade Lake-SP)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))

Package

8 billions
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
165 W
Power Consumption
200 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
24
Total Core Count
48
48
Total Thread Count
96
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
25.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
35.75 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
8
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
96

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy