Home Comparison Xeon W 11955M vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

Xeon W 11955M vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon W 11955M with 8 cores 2.1GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon W 11955M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 2.1GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 24MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Xeon W 11955M +10%
2199
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654
1984
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Xeon W 11955M
9895
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 +101%
19940
VS

General Parameters

May 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Tiger Lake-H
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel BGA 1787
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
UHD Graphics 750
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Tiger Lake-H)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
35 W
Power Consumption
360 W
72 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
190 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

2.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
8
Total Core Count
96
16
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
24.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1.25 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
5
20
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy