Home Comparison Xeon W 11955M vs EPYC Embedded 8224P

Xeon W 11955M vs EPYC Embedded 8224P

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon W 11955M with 8 cores 2.1GHz and EPYC Embedded 8224P with 24 cores 2.55GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon W 11955M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 160W)
EPYC Embedded 8224P 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.55GHz vs 2.1GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 24MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

May 2021
Release Date
Sep 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Tiger Lake-H
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel BGA 1787
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
UHD Graphics 750
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Tiger Lake-H)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))

Package

-
Transistor Count
17.75 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
35 W
Power Consumption
160 W
72 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
190 mm²
Die Size
2x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

2.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.55 GHz
5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
8
Total Core Count
24
16
Total Thread Count
48
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
25.5
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1.25 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
5
20
PCIe Lanes
96

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy