Home Comparison Xeon W 1350 vs AMD EPYC 9654

Xeon W 1350 vs AMD EPYC 9654

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon W 1350 with 6 cores 3.3GHz and AMD EPYC 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon W 1350 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.3GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (80W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC 9654 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Xeon W 1350 +9%
2163
AMD EPYC 9654
1984
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Xeon W 1350
8437
AMD EPYC 9654 +136%
19940
VS

General Parameters

May 2021
Release Date
Nov 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Rocket Lake-S
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 1200
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
UHD Graphics P750
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Rocket Lake-S)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
80 W
Power Consumption
360 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
276 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

3.3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
6
Total Core Count
96
12
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
33.0
Multiplier
24.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 KB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
12 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
12
51.2 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
5
20
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy