Home Comparison Xeon X5355 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P

Xeon X5355 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon X5355 with 4 cores 2.667GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon X5355 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.667GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (120W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 65nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Xeon X5355
301
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P +589%
2075
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Xeon X5355
1355
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P +1589%
22897
VS

General Parameters

Nov 2006
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Clovertown
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 771
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Clovertown)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

0.582 billions
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
65 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
120 W
Power Consumption
360 W
63 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
-
Foundry
TSMC
2x143 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

2.667 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
4
Total Core Count
96
4
Total Thread Count
192
333 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
8.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
4 MB per die
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR2, DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

0
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy