Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
9024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10 PCIe +9482%
31.24 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2013
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
9216
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

162.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
488.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
31.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
976.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GK107
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy