NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 116% (1695MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
7872 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10 PCIe
+1382%
31.24 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Blender
A10 PCIe
+1307%
2505
Quadro K4200
178
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
885 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
9216
Shading Units
1344
288
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
162.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
488.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
31.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
976.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
108W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GK104
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
