Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA GRID K520

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA GRID K520

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB and 4GB VRAM GRID K520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A100 PCIe 80 GB +751%
19.49 TFLOPS
GRID K520
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Jul 2013
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1512 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
5120bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.94TB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
1536
432
TMUs
128
160
ROPs
32
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
80 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

225.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
609.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
77.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.49 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
9.746 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy