Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
6464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A100 PCIe 80 GB +1792%
19.49 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1512 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
5120bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1.94TB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
14
6912
Shading Units
448
432
TMUs
56
160
ROPs
48
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
80 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

225.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
609.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
77.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.49 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
9.746 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy