Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
7136 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10M +34885%
23.44 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
4
7168
Shading Units
32
224
TMUs
16
80
ROPs
8
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
42W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy