Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
6592 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10M +3012%
23.44 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
7168
Shading Units
576
224
TMUs
48
80
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy