Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10M +4973%
23.44 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
24
7168
Shading Units
192
224
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
108W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy