Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1635MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10M +1212%
23.44 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2022
Release Date
Apr 2016
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
7168
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
80
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy