Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs Intel Arc Pro A40

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs Intel Arc Pro A40

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 0% (1700MHz vs 1695MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe +24%
4.339 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2022
Tesla
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

10
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
8
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy