Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 231.9GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1695MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe +27%
4.339 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
1792
Shading Units
1280
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
250W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GA107
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
Unknown
352 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy