CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
VS
NVIDIA A16 PCIe
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe
+9542%
4.339 TFLOPS
GeForce 315 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe
VS
GeForce 315 OEM
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2011
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
10
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-300-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.26 billion
Unknown
Die Size
57 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
33W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe
2
NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA A30 PCIe
3
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe
4
NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
5
NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe
7
NVIDIA A2 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe
8
NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD Radeon R7 370
9
NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition
10
NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs Intel Arc A580
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy