Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe +543%
4.339 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
30
1280
Shading Units
240
40
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
219W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy