Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2005
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
83W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
NV41
-
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Ampere
Architecture
Curie
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
130 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.19 billion
Unknown
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy