Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD Radeon R9 290

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 231.9GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe
4.339 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290 +11%
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2013
Tesla
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
2560
40
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
275W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy