Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A2 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

NVIDIA A2 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1770MHz vs 1440MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 200.1GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A2
4.531 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +127%
10.32 TFLOPS
A2
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
56
1280
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
40
Tensor Cores
224
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
165W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
54.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy