Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A2 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA A2 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Lower TDP (60W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (2250MHz vs 1770MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 200.1GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A2
4.531 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +408%
23.04 TFLOPS
A2
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
40
1280
Shading Units
5120
40
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
40
Tensor Cores
160
10
RT Cores
40
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
35.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy