Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A30 PCIe vs ATI FirePro V4800

NVIDIA A30 PCIe vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM A30 PCIe and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A30 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
3184 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A30 PCIe +1564%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Tesla Ampere
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
400
224
TMUs
20
96
ROPs
8
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

165W
TDP
69W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy