Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
10712 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A40 PCIe +116837%
37.42 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Jan 2009
Tesla
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
695.8GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
84
SM Count
-
10752
Shading Units
40
336
TMUs
4
112
ROPs
4
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

194.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
584.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
37.42 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
37.42 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
584.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
32W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy