Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs AMD FirePro W9000

NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (274W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A40 PCIe +836%
37.42 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
695.8GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
84
SM Count
-
10752
Shading Units
2048
336
TMUs
128
112
ROPs
32
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

194.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
584.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
37.42 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
37.42 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
584.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
274W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy