Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs NVIDIA NVS 310

NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
10704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A40 PCIe +37320%
37.42 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
695.8GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
84
SM Count
1
10752
Shading Units
48
336
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

194.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
584.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
37.42 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
37.42 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
584.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
20W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy