Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs Intel Arctic Sound M

AMD Instinct MI300A vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +731%
122.6 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Instinct
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM3
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

228
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14592
Shading Units
8192
880
TMUs
256
0
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

760W
TDP
500W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
146 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net