AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
13056 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 760W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A
+5552%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2013
Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
228
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14592
Shading Units
1536
880
TMUs
128
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
760W
TDP
122W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MI300
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
