Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

AMD Instinct MI300A vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (2100MHz vs 1700MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 3277GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +170%
122.6 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Nov 2021
Instinct
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM3
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

228
Compute Units
208
-
-
-
14592
Shading Units
13312
880
TMUs
832
0
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

760W
TDP
500W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
146 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy