Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
19440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +563348%
163.4 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Oct 2007
Instinct
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM3
Memory Type
DDR2
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
19456
Shading Units
16
880
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

750W
TDP
21W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
146 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy