Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (2100MHz vs 1358MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +2250%
163.4 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
6.953 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Apr 2021
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
893 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
19456
Shading Units
2560
880
TMUs
80
0
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
95W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GA106
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
146 billion
Transistors
12 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy