Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
18688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +14973%
163.4 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2013
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
768
880
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
75W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy