Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
19008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +15794%
163.4 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2011
Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
19456
Shading Units
448
880
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
247W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
146 billion
Transistors
3 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy