Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (2350MHz vs 1800MHz)
640 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc 140T Mobile
+248%
4.813 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
1.382 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
Dec 2023
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.765 TFLOPS
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1382 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
28W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
Meteor Lake GT1
-
-
-
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
Xe-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
3 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
