Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs Intel UHD Graphics 32EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 32EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 176% (2350MHz vs 850MHz)
768 additional rendering cores
Intel UHD Graphics 32EU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc 140T Mobile
+1006%
4.813 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 32EU
0.435 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Arc 140T Mobile
+392%
4012
UHD Graphics 32EU
815
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc 140T Mobile
+419%
1986
UHD Graphics 32EU
382
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
Jan 2021
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
350 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
850 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
256
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.800 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
870.4 GFLOPS
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
Jasper Lake GT1
-
-
-
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
Generation 11.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
3 nm
Process Size
10 nm+
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
