Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs AMD FirePro V5900

Intel Arc A310 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310 +337%
2.688 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
May 2011
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
768
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Cayman
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy