Intel Arc A310 vs ATI FirePro V9800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
+1%
2.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Sep 2010
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1600
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Cypress
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
