Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs AMD FireStream 9250

Intel Arc A350 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +207%
3.072 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
RV770
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy