Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Intel Arc A350 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (2000MHz vs 1500MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +249%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2018
Alchemist
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
56
768
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
224
24
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Vega 10
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy